Fandom

Case Briefs

Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority

560pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Comments0 Share

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

FactsEdit

Wilsher, an infant, developed a condition in the first months of his life. There were many possible causes of this condition, including an irregular partial pressure of oxygen in the body, which the Authority failed to monitor properly. However, they did not negligently perform any of the other potential causes. The infant developed problems with its eyes.

IssueEdit

  1. Does the McGhee principle apply when there are numerous possible causes of a disease, and the defendants only caused one of them?

DecisionEdit

Appeal allowed.

ReasonsEdit

Lord Bridge of Harwich states that the McGhee principle does not apply to this case. In McGhee there was only one possible factor leading to the injury – the brick dust. In this case there were numerous possibilities, and it is not known whether the Authority's negligence actually led to the injury. It is equally likely that any of the other possible causes created the injury. There can be no presumption here that the negligence led to the injury, and therefore the Authority cannot be held liable.

RatioEdit

The McGhee principle does not apply unless there is only one cause of the injury, and it happened as a result of the defendant’s actions; defendants cannot be held liable for an injury if their negligence only led to one of numerous causes, and it cannot be determined what actually caused the injury.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki